Services and availability
Buy the evidence needed for the next decision—not a vague promise of safety.
Start with free tools. If a decision needs human review, the paid scope must name the question, deliverable, exclusions, timing, fee, provider, and responsibility boundary before work begins.
Availability reviewed
14 July 2026
Pilot status means scope-dependent and limited—not a claim of permanent capacity or coverage.
Read the evidence policyCurrent service ladder
Availability is shown at the level we can support today. Planned products are labelled as planned; coordination is not presented as an owned service network.
Free buyer tools
Available nowSelf-service tools that help a buyer define the product and structure an evidence request before speaking to a supplier or reviewer.
Included at this level
- • RFQ Builder: a structured bilingual or English-only supplier brief.
- • Supplier Evidence Check: a local, browser-based intake and follow-up summary.
- • Landed Cost Scenario: a transparent calculation using the buyer's own dated classifications, rates, bases, and shipment inputs.
- • Sample → PO → QC Plan: a control record connecting the approved sample, tolerances, changes, inspections, and payment gates.
Boundary
No supplier is contacted or verified. The tools do not issue a risk score, compliance conclusion, legal opinion, or recommendation.
Public Verification Brief
Pilot — scoped availabilityA buyer-readable brief that maps a narrowly written supplier or product claim to public sources, provenance, limitations, unknowns, and next actions.
Included at this level
- • Defined buyer question and decision stage.
- • Source register with capture dates and provenance labels.
- • Claim-level status, what the evidence can and cannot establish, unknowns, and next verification actions.
Boundary
Public research cannot prove factory control, document authenticity, live capacity, product compliance, beneficiary ownership, or facts outside the sources and dates reviewed. Publication is never automatic and requires a public-release review.
2–3 Supplier Evidence Comparison
Pilot — by written engagementA decision-specific comparison of two or three named counterparties against the same product definition, evidence questions, and transaction gates.
Included at this level
- • A controlled comparison basis so unlike quotes and operating models are not treated as equivalent.
- • Entity, payment, product-document, operating-model, and unresolved-evidence comparison where those fields are in scope.
- • A next-action register for sampling, document checks, specialist review, or on-site observation.
Boundary
Not a supplier leaderboard, universal score, endorsement, blacklist, or guarantee. Missing data stays unknown; it does not become a pass or fail.
Specialist or on-site coordination
Case by case — provider dependentCoordination may be considered when a decision requires qualified laboratory, compliance, customs, legal, inspection, engineering, or on-site work beyond public research.
Included at this level
- • The question to be handed off, required qualification, location or sample, and expected evidence output.
- • The proposed provider role, responsibility boundary, third-party charge, and whether AllForSourcing is coordinating or performing any part of the work.
- • A place in the evidence register for the provider's dated, scoped result and limitations.
Boundary
Availability is not guaranteed. No standing laboratory, auditor, legal, customs, or global field network is represented on this page. A third party's work remains governed by its own scope and professional responsibility.
Order Evidence Room
Future product — not for saleA planned private workspace concept for retaining the approved specification, supplier evidence, change record, sample, production, inspection, and shipment decision trail for one order.
Included at this level
- • Planned concept only: structured order gates, evidence versions, owners, expiry, unknowns, and change history.
- • Intended to connect supplier verification to sample, purchase order, production, quality control, and reorder evidence.
Boundary
No account, subscription, data room, storage commitment, security specification, launch date, price, or service level is currently offered.
Paid-work gate
When an engagement starts
An email inquiry, uploaded file, or exploratory call is not an agreed paid scope.
A paid engagement begins only after the buyer and the named provider accept a written scope that contains every item below. If a dependency or new fact changes the work materially, the scope must be updated before the additional work proceeds.
- Question
- The exact decision the buyer needs to make next.
- Inputs
- Named entities, files, links, product or model, destination market, and transaction stage supplied for review.
- Deliverable
- The specific report, comparison, evidence register, coordination output, or other work product.
- Exclusions
- What the engagement will not verify, conclude, store, publish, or perform.
- Timing
- Agreed review window, dependencies, and events that can pause or change it.
- Fee
- The engagement fee and every known pass-through or third-party cost requiring approval.
- Provider
- Who performs each part of the work, their role, and any professional responsibility boundary.
Commercial integrity
The business model must not silently change the evidence label.
What we do not sell
- • Suppliers cannot pay for a favorable finding, higher rank, hidden placement, or removal of a supportable material fact.
- • A paid report is not an endorsement, certification, guarantee, marketplace badge, or legal conclusion.
- • Payment does not upgrade supplier-claimed or buyer-provided evidence into independent verification.
Third-party charges
Any proposed laboratory, inspection, translation, registry, travel, legal, customs, engineering, certification, or other third-party charge must be identified and approved in the written scope. The scope must also state who selects, contracts, pays, and is responsible for that provider’s work.
Pricing status
No universal public fee, turnaround time, or service level is represented here. Pilot work varies by question, source access, entity count, language, product and market scope, third-party dependency, and publication requirements. Any fee and timing become valid only in the accepted written scope.
Free tools remain available without converting their output into a paid score or supplier recommendation. The future Order Evidence Room is not currently purchasable.
Request the smallest useful scope.
Send the exact decision, supplier’s Chinese legal name or license, quotation or platform link, payment entity, product and model, destination market, order stage, and deadline. We can then determine whether a free tool, public research, comparison, or qualified handoff is appropriate.